Running is therapy

a blog about running, cats, Linux and programming.
  • Home
  • Current Schedule
  • Personal Records
  • Upcoming Races

What Micorsoft doesn’t get

Published by Nathan Powell on April 26, 2006 07:34 am under computers

The laptop I have is dual boot. XP pro and Gentoo. Last night I decided to reinstall windows. Popped in the cd and installed over the windows partition. Windows of course doesn’t need to concern itself with the possibility that you have a real bootloader installed to the MBR, so without asking it blows that away and promptly plops it’s code in there. That’s cool, whatever. So I get my getoo disk out, boot up and resinstall grub (this didn’t go quite that smoothly, but the details are boring so I’ll spare you). At any rate I eventually got that to work and booted into windows to start the update process.

Then I noticed something funny. The first time I ran windows update it added itself to the short list of programs in the start menu’s intial panel. Cool, makes sense. However, I of course had to run the updater over and over again (I should really consider putting together a disk with SP2 on it). Each time I ran it windows assumes it’s more popualr and so it gets “ranked”. But what they do then is, move it UP the short list. In effect each time you run it, it gets further and further away from the Start button. WTF, that makes no sense at all. I am no usablitily guru, but a child must have been in on that decsion.

5 Comments so far

  1. Don Spidell on April 26th, 2006

    That’s one reason I make WinXP’s desktop and Start Menu look and act like Win2k.

  2. Nathan Powell on April 26th, 2006

    Ahh, I didn’t realize that didn’t do that. I must try that out.

    As an aside, the menuing in Vista is a lot nicer, instead of the fold out that takes over the screen if you have a lot of things installed, it can all be navigated from within the first panel. Which I thinks makes more sense.

    Thanks for the commet Don.

  3. Josiah Ritchie on April 26th, 2006

    If you right-click on the item in that list you have the option of removing it from the list so that it is no longer in the way and bothering you. It isn’t the prettiest solution, but it works.

  4. Nathan Powell on April 26th, 2006

    It’s no so much that it is in the way, as is moves UP the list, instead of down…hence closer to where the mouse is. But removing it might be a good idea too :)

Posting your comment.

  • Search

  • Archives

    • November 2008 (1)
    • October 2008 (10)
    • September 2008 (4)
    • August 2008 (10)
    • July 2008 (11)
    • June 2008 (14)
    • May 2008 (15)
    • April 2008 (10)
    • March 2008 (16)
    • February 2008 (17)
    • January 2008 (37)
    • December 2007 (21)
    • November 2007 (30)
    • October 2007 (29)
    • September 2007 (22)
    • August 2007 (30)
    • July 2007 (49)
    • June 2007 (32)
    • May 2007 (29)
    • April 2007 (38)
    • March 2007 (26)
    • February 2007 (25)
    • January 2007 (23)
    • December 2006 (10)
    • November 2006 (12)
    • October 2006 (9)
    • September 2006 (9)
    • August 2006 (5)
    • July 2006 (13)
    • June 2006 (9)
    • May 2006 (8)
    • April 2006 (11)
    • March 2006 (12)
    • February 2006 (12)
    • January 2006 (13)
    • December 2005 (15)
    • November 2005 (19)
    • October 2005 (8)
  • Categories

    • blather (64)
    • books (10)
    • computers (177)
    • cooking (1)
    • economics (3)
    • emacs (3)
    • football (1)
    • gaming (1)
    • hiking (5)
    • housekeeping (5)
    • lifehacking (7)
    • music (3)
    • paddling (2)
    • personal (1)
    • politics (21)
    • programming (71)
    • running (236)
    • smoking (40)
    • sysadmin (11)
    • tlc (10)
    • Uncategorized (1)
  • Pages

    • Current Schedule
    • Personal Records
    • Upcoming Races

Copyright © 2008 Running is therapy
WordPress Theme based on Light Theme