<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nathan Powell is a dick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129</link>
	<description>Bad running advice, boring family stuff, and technology few find interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Powell</title>
		<link>http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129/comment-page-1#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Hello there Don,

Sorry I didn&#039;t get back sooner.  Let me start by saying, I meant to comment on your blog the other day about your change in duties at work, it sounds very cool...unfortunately I got sidteracked.

Now for your comment...I agree having the name in the meta tags in and of itself doesn&#039;t constitute spamming.  However the content is not Nathan Powell to the power of 32 :).  Also, let me say, I am not against SEO, while I don&#039;t employ it myself, I am not against, nor do I think one ought to be against SEO.  However, the only possible reason I can come up with for putting that content above in your meta tags is to artificially inflate ones search engine ranking.  Compete on content, not on underhandness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there Don,</p>
<p>Sorry I didn&#8217;t get back sooner.  Let me start by saying, I meant to comment on your blog the other day about your change in duties at work, it sounds very cool&#8230;unfortunately I got sidteracked.</p>
<p>Now for your comment&#8230;I agree having the name in the meta tags in and of itself doesn&#8217;t constitute spamming.  However the content is not Nathan Powell to the power of 32 :).  Also, let me say, I am not against SEO, while I don&#8217;t employ it myself, I am not against, nor do I think one ought to be against SEO.  However, the only possible reason I can come up with for putting that content above in your meta tags is to artificially inflate ones search engine ranking.  Compete on content, not on underhandness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Spidell</title>
		<link>http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129/comment-page-1#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Spidell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanpowell.org/blog/archives/129#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>If it makes you feel any better, searching for &quot;Nathan Powell&quot; on Yahoo! Search makes your site appear first.

I struggle with weather having &quot;Nathan Powell&quot; appear tons of times in meta tags on a site really counts as spam if the site really is about Nathan Powell and &quot;NathanPowell&quot; is in the URL.  It may be redundant, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it makes you feel any better, searching for &#8220;Nathan Powell&#8221; on Yahoo! Search makes your site appear first.</p>
<p>I struggle with weather having &#8220;Nathan Powell&#8221; appear tons of times in meta tags on a site really counts as spam if the site really is about Nathan Powell and &#8220;NathanPowell&#8221; is in the URL.  It may be redundant, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

